Physicists may be a step closer to solving the mystery of proton size


If protons wore clothing, the label
might read “XXS.”

For nearly a decade, scientists have been arguing over the size of the puny subatomic particles: extra small, or extra extra small. A new measurement bolsters the case that protons are more petite than once thought, researchers report in the Sept. 6 Science.

Until 2010, the proton’s radius was
measured at about 0.88 femtometers, or millionths of a billionth of a meter.
But then a new type of measurement — based on exotic atoms made with muons, the
heavy cousins of electrons — clashed with that figure, registering a proton size of about 0.84 femtometers
(SN: 4/18/17).  

One way to test the proton’s radius is
by measuring the separation between the energy levels in which hydrogen atoms
can exist — different states in which the atom’s electron carries a certain
amount of energy. That energy difference depends on the size of the proton.

By measuring the separation between two such
energy levels, physicist Eric Hessels of York University in Toronto and
colleagues have pegged the radius at about 0.83 femtometers, in good agreement
with the 2010 value.

The result adds to a small heap of
recent studies that have claimed a slightly slimmer proton physique, including
a 2017 measurement, made by considering a different set of energy levels in hydrogen atoms (SN: 10/5/17), and an estimate reported in October 2018, based on scattering electrons off of protons (SN: 11/2/18).
However, a study published in May 2018 went against the slim-proton trend, falling in line with the original, larger value of
the radius.

The inability to settle on a size is
impeding researchers’ ability to test essential tenets of physics, like quantum
electrodynamics, the theory that describes interactions of electrically charged
particles. But resolving the debate is likely to be no small feat.

Click on a tab to select how you'd like to leave your comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *