A newfound black hole in the Milky Way is weirdly heavy


A heavyweight black hole in our galaxy has some explaining
to do.

With a mass of about 68 suns, it is far heftier than other stellar-mass black holes (those with masses below about 100 suns) in and around the Milky Way, scientists say. That’s not just a record, it’s also a conundrum. According to theory, black holes in our galaxy that form from the explosive deaths of massive stars — as this one likely did — shouldn’t be heavier than about 25 suns.

The black hole is locked in orbit with a young blue star dubbed LB-1, which sits about 13,800 light-years away in the constellation Gemini, researchers found. Combing through data from the LAMOST telescope in China, Jifeng Liu, an astrophysicist at the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing, and colleagues noticed that LB-1 repeatedly moves toward and away from Earth with great speed — a sign that the star orbits something massive.

With additional observations from telescopes in Hawaii and the Canary Islands, the team mapped
out the orbit and deduced that the star gets whipped around by a dark mass
roughly 68 times as massive as the sun. Only a black hole fits
that description
, the team reports November 27 in Nature.

“I never thought in my wildest dreams you could form a black
hole this big [in the Milky Way],” says Michael Zevin, an astrophysicist at
Northwestern University in Evanston, Ill. “If the observations pan out to be
correct, this is really going to have people scratching their heads.”

This black hole is not the heftiest in the Milky Way. That
title goes to the behemoth in the center of the galaxy, a supermassive black
hole in a class all its own with a mass of over 4 million suns. The mass of
LB-1’s black hole is, however, on par with some
of the black holes discovered recently by gravitational wave detectors
which sense ripples in spacetime from (among other things) merging pairs of
black holes (SN: 2/17/16). 

But those black holes formed in far-off galaxies, probably in
environments with a relative dearth of elements heavier than helium. The star
LB-1 has a richer inventory of those elements, and presumably the star that
formed its partner black hole had a similar stock. Stars with a greater
abundance of heavy elements lose more of their mass to stellar winds, as those
elements present a larger target to the radiation that drives those winds. Massive
stars that form black holes also eject a lot of their mass during the supernova
explosions that end their lives.

“These two processes make very small black holes even out of
very massive stars,” Liu says. But the black hole near LB-1 apparently didn’t
get that memo.

To make a black hole of 68 solar masses requires a reduction
in the mass lost to stellar winds by a factor of five, Liu says. “We don’t know
whether this is possible theoretically.”

Alternatively, the black hole might have emerged from a
failed supernova, an attempted stellar explosion that doesn’t have quite enough
energy to hurl the star’s guts into space, leaving the gas to fall back into
the black hole.

The team also wonders if the black hole is the work of two
stars. The scenario is speculative, Liu says, and “the odds are slim.” But in
this story, LB-1 once orbited a snuggled-up pair of heftier stars that died and
left behind two cores that merged into one black hole.

It’s also possible that what appears to be a single
68-solar-mass black hole is actually two lighter black holes locked in a tight
embrace. Such a pair would periodically nudge LB-1, giving it a subtle rocking
motion that Liu and colleagues are searching for with other telescopes.  

Before getting caught up in potential origin stories, the observations need to be double-checked, Zevin cautions. “I wouldn’t put money down that it’s a definitive detection yet,” he says.

The one catch, which the researchers do note, is that the
calculated mass of the black hole depends on getting the distance to LB-1
correct. Their derived distance of 13,800 light-years — based on the star’s
apparent brightness and calculations of its intrinsic luminosity — is about twice
as far as the distance to the star determined by the Gaia satellite, a
multiyear mission to
create a precise 3-D map of over 1 billion stars in the Milky Way
). If the Gaia distance is correct, then the black hole might be only
10 times as massive as the sun. (If the star is closer, then it’s less luminous,
so less massive. That would mean that a lighter black hole is needed to explain
the speed at which the star is getting whipped around.)

That’s not necessarily a strike against the study. The
researchers note that a much lower luminosity for the star would be at odds
with its measured temperature. And if LB-1 is wobbling around a black hole,
that would throw off the accuracy of the Gaia data, says Zevin. “But it is an
important point that needs to be worked out.”

Click on a tab to select how you'd like to leave your comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *